FELLOW

For people done with confident nonsense

Tired of uploading documents to AI and getting crap responses?

You already gave it the MSA. The call transcript. The deck. It still invents the buyer, mangles the stage, and quotes a clause that isn’t there. FELLOW is the layer that stops that, so answers match what your documents actually say, not what the model feels like saying.

Pre-launch design partners. No spam, or email hello@cortadogroup.com

Sound familiar?
  • Upload → wait → wrong answer
  • Sounds smart. Isn’t.
  • You re-read the PDF yourself anyway
01. The pain

You did the work. The model still lies to you.

Every “just paste it into ChatGPT” session ends the same way: a polished answer you can’t take into a client call, because half of it isn’t in the file and the other half is from the wrong year.

The documents aren’t the problem. Trusting a search over them as if it were truth is.

you, 9:14am

“Summarize this MSA.” Gets a retention number that was never in §7.

you, 11:02am

“Who’s the economic buyer?” Names the wrong person with total confidence.

you, 2:40pm

Re-uploads the same deck for the third time. Answer still soft and wrong.

you, 4:55pm

Opens the PDF yourself. Again. Because you can’t stake a deal on vibes.

02. Why it keeps failing

“Similar” is not “true.”

What you’re stuck with today

Upload. Embed. Pray.

  • Chunks that sound related win the ranking
  • A 2023 deck beats the 2026 contract
  • Conflicts get blended into one smooth lie
  • You re-check every answer by hand

Great for vibes. Catastrophic for a deal, a clause, or a buyer’s name.

What you actually need

Stop guessing. Show the receipt.

  • Claims tied to the line they came from
  • Org, persona, stage, not a wall of prose
  • Honest “we don’t know yet” instead of fiction
  • Answers you can take into a real conversation

That’s FELLOW. Not another chatbot. The layer under the crap. Why RAG alone fails →

03. The fix

Same documents. Answers that stop wasting your time.

No more re-upload roulette. Feed it once. Get something you can actually use.

  1. Ingest

    Drop the contracts, transcripts, threads you already live in. Stop pasting the same PDF into a new chat every Monday.

  2. Extract

    Pull real claims out: who reports to whom, what they said, what the contract binds, not a summary that freestyles.

  3. Prove it

    Every claim keeps the source. If it can’t show where it came from, it doesn’t get to sound sure.

  4. Use it

    See the account as an org chart, a process, a persona, or hand the same truth to an agent that won’t freestyle.

04. What changes

Walk into the call without re-reading the deck.

Not another blob of AI prose. The account in the shapes you already argue about: who owns what, where the deal is, what they care about.

org_chart

Who actually reports to whom

Not the org chart from last year’s kickoff deck that everyone knows is wrong.

See on platform →
buyer_process_map

Where the deal really is

Stage moves when the evidence moves, not when someone forgot to flip a CRM field.

See on platform →
persona

What they actually said

Preferences and objections you can open back to the call, not a made-up persona paragraph.

See on platform →
05. Why this is different

Chatbots will die on these two hills. We won’t.

Anything can summarize. What wrecks you is the fake certainty, and the silence when something is missing.

  fct_04J1: claim with receiptauthority: contractual

“Retention overrides the standard 90-day policy for this account.”

Prove it

  • msa_v3.pdf: §7.2, Data Retention[1]
  • renewal-call · 2026-05-14 · 00:41:20[2]
No floating claims

If it can’t show the source, it doesn’t get to sound sure.

Stop accepting answers that can’t open the page they came from. Every claim in FELLOW links to the clause, message, or moment in the call. So you can verify in one click instead of re-reading the whole file.

  • Click through to the original source
  • Old stuff gets superseded, not ranked as “still relevant”
  • Corrections stick; they don’t vanish into a new chat
  acct_4471: known gapsdiscovery

What we don’t yet know

  • Signing authority above $50k: unconfirmedgap
  • Incumbent vendor & contract end dategap
  • Security review requirement: implied, unverifiedgap
No silent holes

It says when it doesn’t know instead of freestyling.

Half the damage isn’t wrong answers. It’s answers that paper over missing information. FELLOW surfaces the gaps as the next thing to go find before a client does it for you.

  • Missing facts flagged, not invented
  • Gaps become a discovery list, not a vibe check
  • Agents can ask for what’s absent, not fill it in
06. Who this is for

If you’ve been burned by
“just ask the model,” this is for you.

01

People who still open the PDF

Because you can’t walk into a renewal with AI fan fiction. See the account (org, stage, persona) and click any claim back to proof before you say it out loud.

02

Agents that must not freestyle

Same account truth over the API. Scoped, current, grounded, so automation doesn’t invent a signer or a stage while you’re not looking.